script conference la Indiana Jones

priceless, ,de pe blogul lui mystery man on film se poate downloada intreaga story conference din 1981 (transcript pdf) a celor 5 zile (cite 9 ore) de discutii intre George Lucas, Spielberg si Lawrence Kasdan, ales ca scenarist al unui filmulet intitulat atunci...Raiders of the Lost Ark.

comentariile lui mystery man legate de momentele importante ale discutiei, si cum
s-a creionat Indy din ele, sunt al fel de interesante !
iata dovada ca 13 martie nu e o zi cu ghinion !

"I'm thirsty Lloyd !"

Lloyd:

What will you be drinking, sir?

Jack Torrance:

Hair of the dog that bit me, Lloyd.

pentru mareata zi de 8 martie, in which i haven't had a drink, ok ?

Lloyd:

Women. Can't live with them, can't live without them.

Jack Torrance:

Words of wisdom, Lloyd, my man. Words of wisdom.

si varianta autohtona (sometime in February, but no Xmas in February, Lou)

photo by mosheda(y)an. blog de night/daywatch, in cazul asta night (of the living dead)

Lloyd:

How are things going, Mr. Torrance?

Jack Torrance:

Things could be better, Lloyd. Things could be a whole lot better.

Public Enemies

posterul la noul film al lui Michael Mann cu Depp as Dillinger, 1 iulie la ei, look de Untouchables si prea multe Thompson guns...

m-am apucat sa revad DILLINGER al lui John Milius (1973) intre timp, Warren Oates as John D si Ben Johnson in rolul de azi al lui Christian Bale
si trailerul aici

Watchmen reviews

Movie Reviews: Watchmen
dupa imdb

Most critics have apparently not been influenced one whit by all the praise for Watchmen by fans of the graphic novel, something that Michael Phillips acknowledges in his review in the Chicago Tribune. "Zack Snyder's bloated screen adaptation will go over best with fanboys, fangirls, fanmen and fanwomen who give high marks for slavish fidelity to the source material," he writes. Kenneth Turan in the Los Angeles Times calls it "something acceptable but pedestrian, an adaptation that is more a prisoner of its story than the master of it." It's "a bore," writes Philip Kenicott in the Washington Post, it's "long, dull and ... sinks under the weight of its reverence for the original." Claudia Puig in USA Today says that it "starts out powerfully" but as it proceeds, "it grows plodding, convoluted and forgettable." And A.O. Scott in the New York Times concludes that the entire premise of the film "is rooted in a view of human behavior that is fundamentally immature, self-pitying and sentimental." But Kyle Smith in the New York Post is won over. "It transforms each moment into a tableau with great, uncompromising concentration. The effect is an almost airless gloom, but the film is also exhilarating in breadth and depth. There is more going on in the spectacular opening-credits sequence than in the three Spider-Man flicks combined." And Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times awards it four stars, writing, "The film is rich enough to be seen more than once. ... I'm not sure I understood all the nuances and implications, but I am sure I had a powerful experience."

deci mixed at best
si this one by the ugly film freak centrals


"The movie's all about the jerking-off, not the yawning emptiness and self-loathing that immediately follows. It's pretty. And it means nothing to me."-Walter Chaw
bad Chaw, bad chaw, aw !